This is more a rant than anything else, and a bit faraway sports bra and leggings from the discussion of hiking, and hiking clothes for women. Sure I'd love to start a clothes company of my own which would also have it’s own “social mission” so to talk. Clothing companies aims are making a living by targeting women. In the process the majority of clothing firms make the world worse for ladies. It's as if it is an agenda in opposition to women. Probably most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by men from the drawing board to the ultimate sewing together of the apparel merchandise. The few girls who are in the women’s clothing design business apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a pattern towards better clothes designs for women who want practicality, dignity and operate of their clothes. And that is the place the dilemma is available in for loads of ladies who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Women who simply need useful, comfy clothes are truly underrepresented . Sure, a lot of people would say “Not so. Since plenty of low-rise or pores and skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-quick skirts are the form of clothes that most likely the majority of girls purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means these are the kinds that will proceed to be manufactured and moreover these kinds of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all sorts of women’s clothes, even the ones which might be supposed to be for perform not trend. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and many others. It isn't the one clothing firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates vogue into perform. It brings us back to the place we began. As quite a few women who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothes for higher fit, higher consolation, higher freedom of motion and better sturdiness. I would say that basically unisex sizing is one of the best way to go along with some options that may assist accommodate individuals who may need a bit more hip or belly (each men and women). Nearly all of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothing. Men’s sizes are larger even relating to “small” sizes for men. I doubt this is not possible. On the whole, women can fit into men’s clothes this manner. The scrubs had been offered by the facility. I not too long ago was working in a research facility and was required to wear scrubs. I instructed her that in terms of scrubs, a dimension small pant does not match me and it's strange because most small-size men’s pants fit me. The availability person mentioned she thought a size small would fit me. The supply particular person mentioned that it is because women have hips and males don’t. I informed her that evidently a number of small-sized males would discover it hard to slot in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people appear to overlook is that some males do have pretty-distinguished hips and the majority of men’s clothes are meant for males with perfectly straight hips. In actual fact when males get older, of their 40s they very often develop bigger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio commercial for a particular type of Levis denims which had been meant for older men and it was mentioned that the options had extra room in the hip and thigh. But men have a greater deal when it comes to clothes. Women’s clothing is at all times made to incorporate vogue rather than perform. EMS and REI and Sierra Trading Submit, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Information, and numerous different such stores, or online stores have some of the higher forms of clothing meant for hiking and different outdoor activities. Brands such as Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and varied others. These manufacturers are inclined to have the very best materials, and the best features. They've one of the best mix of fabrics in order to be lightweight as possible for scorching days and which can protect in chilly days without a number of bulk. They are likely to have SPF in-built to protect the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to use a large dimension to have room for my shoulders and arms but then the part of the jacket that was beneath the waist bellowed out and just was uncomfortable to wear and simply had a really awkward look to it. But, I've seen such absurdly-reduce jackets for ladies by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to boost the female kind whereas being “useful” for outside exercise, or that is what the designers had in thoughts and yet I should marvel what they were considering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and limiting after i moved. I don’t know how it ever obtained manufactured and probably hundreds were made and it gave the impression to be a waste of time and supplies and it seemed as if the “quality management people” missed some main design flaws. I want I wrote down the type number so that maybe I might discover a link to it within the web and possibly you all can see for your self. There are other women’s active put on that will not be as excessive however which nonetheless have sufficient lack of perform so that most energetic girls simply can't use them. The Gap and Old Navy will not be particularly for lively wear however they have small line of such clothing. I feel that they are terrible in materials and design. The Gap, Outdated Navy, Modell’s, Target, Ok-Mart and other such shops, basically only have clothes fabricated from cotton ( with a few exceptions). Modell’s is alleged to be a “sports store” but it carries exercise clothes for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so on) and although these are nicely-identified model names, I discover that they actually put an excessive amount of fashion into clothes on the expense of perform. They went out of enterprise years ago however in addition they had clothing for women that I found to be impractically designed. In New York City the place I stay there may be one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-effectively-recognized store in decrease Manhattan which sells all kinds of outside/camping/hiking tools and clothes. There was once a store in NYC referred to as Herman’s and another called Robbin’s. Far from it. I've seen women in these shops speaking to gross sales associates and saying that they've seemed all over the place for more sensible designs . There is a company that a number of you most likely have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s lively wear. There are various Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and a few Old Navy’s and It would appear that there are loads of stores that may have something for every lady. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The vast majority of their styles are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas taking part in sports activities or participating in rugged outside actions. Why do I all the time discover that the clothes that come the closest to being functional and rugged and sensible are those that are discontinued and changed by those that aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are actually ineffective. They are meant for ladies who've perfect figures , even who're professional fashions and the bathing suits are sexist in my opinion. They could continue a certain model for several seasons or they might change the type and by no means revive it. Why should any bathing go well with be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the top be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain kinds of designs known as “Grab and Go” that means that the clothes are so virtually designed that you could simply seize them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to exercise or do anything else. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I wish that it was as advertised to be. All through my life I have gone from store to store throughout sure instances of the 12 months in search of the very best rugged and purposeful clothes for winter or summer season. It's at all times laborious to find something near what I need. It often goes for sneakers and slippers and different footwear too. I often should take no matter comes closest and that's usually in the men’s section. There are designs which I will go to my grave scratching my head over regarding why they had been made the best way they have been.. I as soon as found some snug slip-ons made by Teva. However the absurd factor was that the soles had been designed with pretty-deep grooves that had been very intently spaced they usually have been all over the only . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They are the primary piece of clothes that can be touching the bottom and going through all sorts of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing shoes which are meant to be cleaned and are simple to wash. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To enable climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it does not work on any sort of foot put on like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes manufacturer observed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (etc) get stuck within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires implies that plenty of the debris might be hurled off. No human can create that type of physical drive to repeatedly pressure the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way in which that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles hard to wash. It implies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots can be crammed up with debris and would not help much in serving to the wearer to successfully climb; that is that if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to allow the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are product of rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that solely accumulate dirt. I wonder why there aren’t chemists and clothing technicians engaged on a greater kind of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips higher on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it might make it pointless to make grooves on the soles of footwear. I've observed some unusual designs that do not contribute to operate. It appears to me that grooves are just placed on the soles of sneakers for trend functions. This goes for sneakers too. A lot of sneakers which would be good in design in other methods, have very impractically designed soles. So far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such sorts of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. After all I'm not an expert in making sneakers or shoe-soles and that i might be flawed , however I am sufficient of an skilled in carrying shoes meant for energetic lifestyles and I feel that a number of shoe manufacturers are focusing on the incorrect thing. I ponder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it unnecessary . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist space. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I believe it makes the drawstring much less effective and it defeats the aim of the drawstring. Underwear: I have been in stores similar to Ok-Mart and Target where there are a big number of women’s underwear. It is tough to search out the sort of briefs that most of our grandmothers used to put on, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible for my part. I prefer consolation, durability and straightforward-care. All that doesn't speak for me. Something that gets stuck you-know-the place is unacceptable. I've been within the underwear part of shops and other shops (I must admit I by no means looked in Victoria’s Secret but I don’t count on to seek out something sensible there), and I've seen older girls trying to find something that is age-appropriate and dignified and , again, practical. There may be little other than these hello-cuts. See one of many links below for an article about the history of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” will not be modest sufficient. It seems it has all the time been about bodily limiting women. That’s the way in which I have a look at it. Additionally one of the hyperlinks under result in an article about how there will likely be a women’s like of clothing which will be inspired by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It means that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have discovered to what I choose is a certain Jockey brand brief “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the higher form of design to get. Elastic that's merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be much less rugged and the stitching can come undone more simply . I should order a dimension larger than I usually would in order that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One main flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t understand the real purpose of “athletic bras” the best way they're designed. I certain don’t care about “standing out.” ( I truly don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for active lifestyles should hold them in, nothing more. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I've seen some feminine runners who appear to be top heavy and still they're very quick however I'm wondering if they'll develop back problems later in life. I do know that I may not be addressing the needs of girls born with certain sizes, or who've particular wants comparable to after surgical procedure, however sport bras should be made to have enough comfortable tension to forestall bouncing. There may be a need for bras that do what some jock straps are speculated to do. I want to design shirts and vests with tension built into the precise area that might make bras pointless. It can be fantastic for hotter weather and for simplicity, so you don’t must bother with attaching a bra after which a shirt. Simply keep “them” from transferring. Simply slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you'll go out to walk , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a thing? I believe I mentioned in considered one of my previous posts that Coolibar had a fairly good pant for women called Sun Pant. I am sure a variety of women would want such types of clothes. I then installed an elastic band to offer more tension for the reason that waist band could be a bit too large otherwise, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which concerned cutting into the back of the waistband area since the drawstring was sewn into that space. It is rather practical for numerous actions. It's not so long that the hem drags on the ground. It is not for very very popular weather however that can rely by yourself skill to tolerate sizzling weather. It is of a material mix that is not like cotton. All pants should have pockets, but typically the way the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I find it is a very individual thing. This is how most hiking pants ought to be designed. It's a teensy bit too dense for very popular weather very very like the unique Coolibar Sun Pant. It is meant to be used with a belt but I find that I don’t want one to wear this pant. I discovered a pant on Cabela’s that is for males, however which matches well and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of many final two links below). It stretches a bit so it doesn't get tight if you bend or transfer. Of course not everyone has the identical determine as I do so others may need a unique opinion. However typically this is an effective kind of pant . For those who do like it you must write to the corporate and inform them to grasp on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the entrance pockets are designed so because the openings are slits almost completely parallel with the waist. I feel they'll discontinue it so that you might want to give it a try. The fabric stretches so it is not as dangerous as if it had been with jeans with these kinds of pockets. It's an impractical design and i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these sorts of pockets it's important to maneuver your hands in a more unnatural approach and even raise the hem of your shirt to place your hands in your entrance pants pockets. It has to be for type, nothing else. Pockets must be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It is a good suggestion to have zippered pockets. Anyone who has ever gotten his/her open pocket caught on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too close will know what I mean. However sometimes zippers can cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you place your hands in. There's a need to design zippers of non-scraping materials for this function. There can be another men’s pant from Columbia. I feel I discussed them before (see certainly one of the 2 hyperlinks under). Why aren’t any clothing designers working on this? They're of a very good material for hot days, however for me, I found myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband area so as to make the belt unnecessary. I trip a bike. I rarely use shorts even after i jog. But again, I need to settle for whatever comes close to what I need. I came across a operating brief referred to as Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to simply go to clothes shops to look at designs and materials . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I simply wondered why regular long pants usually are not product of such a fabric. It would be glorious for a hiking pant meant for very popular weather. The material was very very similar to a really very lightweight softshell. There's one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I like softshell clothes. It is rather lightweight, not very good for chilly weather by itself but you can put layering below it. It is versatile and suits excellently and permits freedom of motion. However softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer. Also , why aren’t there any really actually virtually-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an awesome summertime softshell. There needs to be a vest for touring. I find myself wishing for such a thing. It does not exist. Why not make one in all lightweight and stretchy material? I do know that I've said to much on this submit. I will cease for now. I hope I did not bore anybody. I have a number of concepts for the higher design of clothes and I'll most likely post again with my ideas unless I'm advised to not. I could have been a bit political too.